Permanent Links Quran-only hope for muslims

Monday, 3 October 2011

there is no grave punishment


According to the Quran, there is no such concept as a ‘punishment in the grave’. This is a concept
completely alien, unsupported by the Quran and is found primarily (with all its details) in Islamic
secondary sources.
 
From a Quran's perspective, the evidence seems overwhelming that at the point of death, one will
become aware of the ‘truth’. Then one will enter ‘Barzakh’, a quintessential state of ‘sleep’ where all
concept of time will be lost. When one finally awakes, they will be confronting the Day of Judgment.
The time lapse will feel as if one had only slept for a small part of the day when in truth, they would
have tarried all the way to the Day of Judgment.
 
Before we take a look at the verses, an immediate question should arise:
What would be the purpose of an appointed Day of Judgment if after death, one were to receive 
their punishment in their graves before the trial had even taken place? 
  
Conviction before trial is not a concept of justice and God is the most Just. In effect, this would
render the Day of Judgment meaningless, a fundamental belief posited by the Quran underscored by
numerous Surahs and verses. God repeatedly informs His creation that He will never be unjust to his
slaves and not an atom's weight of injustice will take place. All actions will be recorded in a clear
record (10:61; 34:3; 99:7-8; 4:40)  


Also:
FROM THE MOMENT ONE DIES AND ARE SUBSEQUENTLY RAISED, IT WILL FEEL LIKE A 
MOMENTARY TIME LAPSE



017:052
"It will be on a Day when He will call you, and you will answer (His call) with (words of) His praise, 
and you will think that you tarried but a little while!"
030.055-56  
On the Day that the Hour (of Reckoning) will be established, the transgressors will swear that they 
tarried not but an hour: thus were they used to being deluded!  But those endued with knowledge 
and faith will say: "Indeed ye did tarry, within God's Decree, to the Day of Resurrection, and this is 
the Day of Resurrection: but you - you were not aware”
  
010:045
“One day He will gather them together: (It will be) as if they had tarried but an hour of a day: they 
will recognise each other: assuredly those will be lost who denied the meeting with God and refused 
to receive true guidance” 
  
046:035
"Therefore patiently persevere, as did (all) messengers of determination; and be in no haste about 
the (Unbelievers). On the Day that they see what they were promised, (it will be) as if they had not 
tarried more than an hour in a single day. (Yours is but) to proclaim the Message: but shall any be 
destroyed except those who transgress?" 
  
079:046
"On the day that they see it, it will be as though they had not tarried but the latter part of a day or 
the early part of it"
  
Similar wisdom is imparted in other verses: 
The Sleepers of the Cave slept for many hundreds of years (God knows best the exact 
period) but they felt they had only slept for a little while (18:19)
• A man slept for a 100 years but he only felt like that he slept for a part of a day (2:259)
  
THE DAY OF JUDGMENT IS ONLY A BLINKING OF AN EYE AWAY
  
In the context of the above verses, it becomes clear what is meant by the following verse which 
completely resonates with the theme of the Quran. At the point of death (which can come upon any 
of us at a stroke) and the Day of raising, it is but a blink of an eye. 
  
016:077
“And to God belongs the Unseen of the heavens and the earth, and the matter of the Hour (of 
Doom) is but as a twinkling of the eye, or it is nearer still. Indeed! God is Able to do all things”



WHEN ONE DIES, THEY ENTER 'BARZAKH' - HUMAN CONCEPT OF TIME IS LOST
023:100
"That I may do right in that which I have left behind! But nay! It is but a word that he speaks; and 
behind them is a barrier (Arabic: Barzakhun) until the day when they are raised."

010:045
“And on the day when He shall gather them together, (when it will seem) as though they had tarried 
but an hour of the day, recognising one another, those will verily have perished who denied the 
meeting with God and were not guided”


AT THE POINT WHEN YOU DIE, THE ACTUAL TRUTH (OF PURPOSE) WILL BE KNOWN 
ESPECIALLY FOR DISBELIEVERS
  
006.093
"And who is more unjust than he who forges a lie against God, or says: It has been revealed to me; 
while nothing has been revealed to him, and he who says: I can reveal the like of what God has 
revealed? and if you had seen when the unjust shall be in the agonies of death and the angels shall 
spread forth their hands: Give up your souls; today you shall be recompensed with an ignominious 
chastisement because you spoke against God other than the truth and (because) you showed 
pride against His communications



A MISQUOTED VERSE

Regrettably, without reconciling the Quranic narratives in full and due to beliefs stemming from 
popular traditions, one often finds use being made of isolated Quranic verses to authenticate 
doctrines not taught by the Quran. 
  
With regards the example of Pharaoh, the following verse is often cited to justify the belief of 
‘punishment in the grave’. 
040:046
“In front of the Fire will they be brought, morning and evening: and (the sentence will be) on the Day 
that Judgment will be established: "Cast ye the People of Pharaoh into the severest Penalty” 


If read in context, it becomes absolutely clear that this is a reference to the Day of Judgment.
040:047
“And when they shall contend one with another in the fire, then the weak shall say to those who 
were proud: Surely we were your followers; will you then avert from us a portion of the fire?”
It is difficult to accept 40:46 as a reference to a ‘punishment in the grave’. Mutual disputes between 
the people of Pharaoh in the fire clearly indicate a state of communal punishment and not a 
punishment in separate graves.  
  
The very next verse provides even more clarity: 
040:048
“Those who were proud shall say: Surely we are all in it: surely God has judged between the 
servants”
Furthermore, given the descriptive traditions which deal with punishment in the grave, one has to 
acknowledge that Pharaoh actually drowned but was later preserved in body (10:92) and has no 
grave in the sense we commonly understand it.  So the difficulty with traditional understanding 
continues in so much as how one then reconciles Pharaoh's punishment in the grave when his body 
was never buried. Clearly, the verses are misquoted.
  
The key to understand any Quranic theme is to remain consistent with all the Quranic verses. 



FINAL THOUGHTS 


In keeping with all the Quranic verses and with a view to remain consistent, it is clear that the Quran 
informs the reader that death can approach one at any point. At the point of death, one will come to 
know the TRUTH, the possible REALITY of his actual purpose on earth. One will then enter a state of 
‘Barzakh’ where all human concept of time will cease. Once awoken, one would be face to face with 
the Day of judgment and it would have felt that one had tarried just a short while (regardless of 
actual time).   
  
This is when the final judgment would then begin, where not an atom's weight of injustice would 
take place (99:7-8). God’s concept of time is completely different from our own (22:47; 32:5; 70:4) 



SOME QUESTIONS:
• Is it possible that mankind, impatient as they are, have devised stories to attribute 
punishment to disbelieving dead ones to cover the period of existence of man? After all, why 
should one wait for the Day of Resurrection when it is far more comforting to know that a 
disbeliever is being punished incessantly till the Day of Resurrection? This is in stark contrast with the consistent message from the Quran that mankind will only be raised on the Day of 
Resurrection. There is no intermediate rising which will be a necessary precursor in order to 
feel the punishment of the grave and any associated questions one may be asked as a prelim 
to this process.
• If there was such an unjust concept of grave punishment, how could one reconcile the 
period of the Azaab (punishment) of someone who died as a disbeliever 5000 years ago and 
one that dies 2 minutes before the Day of Resurrection? It seems awfully unjust that 
someone who dies 5000 years ago should receive a greater period of punishment in the 
grave than someone who died moments before the day of resurrection and who may 
actually be a greater sinner. In parallel, it seems equally unfair to the individual born 5000 
years ago that due to his period of birth, his punishment would be prolonged. 
• Not everyone is buried in a grave, some are cremated, some are frozen on the tips of 
mountains (e.g. unsuccessful climbs), some die in aviation accidents and of course in many 
others ways. For those who would wish to reconcile this, a plausible explanation would be to 
introduce the concept of punishment in ‘Barzakh’, a state not confined to graves.  If this line 
of argument is to be followed, then why is the Quran absolutely silent about punishment 
within this state of Barzakh and why does most of the Ahadith corpus allude to a physical 
punishment in the grave? Furthermore, the Quran clearly states that from the time of death 
to awakening, it will feel like a mere part of a day.
  
Answer-Every night we are put to sleep (which in Quranic terms is expressed as death 39:42) and every 
morning there is a new rising. Every night, we are reminded of this ‘practice run’ akin to death and 
the final awakening, yet many remain blind to God’s portents. 


039:042
“ It is God that takes the souls (of men) at death; and those that die not (He takes) during their sleep: 
those on whom He has passed the decree of death, He keeps back (from returning to life), but the 
rest He sends (to their bodies) for a term appointed verily in this are Signs for those who reflect”







Thursday, 8 September 2011

message of quran



bulletHonor each other: "O mankind! We created you from a male and a female and made you into nations and tribes that you may know and honor each other (not that you should despise one another). Indeed the most honorable of you in the sight of God is the most righteous." Chapter 49, Verse 13
bulletGod loves the kind: "God does not forbid you to be kind and equitable to those who have neither fought against your faith nor driven you out of your homes. In fact God loves the equitable." Chapter 60, Verse 8
bulletAbout Jesus: "And in their [the earlier prophets] footsteps We sent Jesus the son of Mary, confirming the law that had come before him. We sent him the Gospel, therein was guidance and light and confirmation of the law that had come before him, a guidance and an admonition to those who fear God." Chapter 5, Verse 46
bulletGood and evil: "Whoever recommends and helps a good cause becomes a partner therein, and whoever recommends and helps an evil cause shares in its burden." Chapter 4, Verse 85
bulletReaction to evil: "Repel (evil) with what is better. Then will he, between whom and thee was hatred, become as it were thy friend and intimate. And no one will be granted such goodness except those who exercise patience and self-restraint." Chapter 41, Verse 34 and 35
bulletDo good: "Be quick in the race for forgiveness from your Lord, and for a Garden (paradise) whose width is that of the heavens and of the earth, prepared for the righteous - Those who spend (freely), whether in prosperity or in adversity, who restrain (their) anger and pardon (all) men - for God loves those who do good." Chapter 3, Verses 133-134
bulletReward for righteousness: "Whoever works righteousness, man or woman, and has faith, verily, to them will We give a new Life, a life that is good and pure, and We will bestow on such their reward according to the best of their actions."  Chapter 16, Verse 97
bulletActs of compassion: "And what will explain to you what the steep path is? It is the freeing of a (slave) from bondage; or the giving of food in a day of famine to an orphan relative, or to a needy in distress. Then will he be of those who believe, enjoin fortitude and encourage kindness and compassion." Chapter 90, Verses 12-17

bulletGod is light: "God is the Light of the heavens and the earth. The parable of His Light is as if there were a Niche, and within it a lamp; the Lamp enclosed in Glass; the glass a brilliant star, lit from a blessed Tree, an Olive neither of the East nor of the West whose Oil is well-nigh luminous though fire scarce touched it. Light upon Light! God doth guide whom He will to His Light." Chapter 24, Verse 35
bulletEven the birds praise God: "Seest thou not that it is God whose praises all beings in the heavens and on earth do celebrate, (even) the birds (of the air) with wings outspread? Each one knows its own (mode of) prayer and praise." Chapter 24, Verse 41
bulletLove and mercy: "And among His signs is this that He created for you mates from among yourselves, that ye may dwell in tranquility with them, and He has put love and mercy between your (hearts); verily in that are signs for those who reflect."Chapter 30, Verse 21
bulletForgiveness and justice: "Show forgiveness, speak for justice and avoid the ignorant." Chapter 7, Verse 199
bulletRevelation: "Say ye: 'We believe in God and the revelation given to us and to Abraham, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) Prophets from their Lord. We make no difference between one and another of them, and we bow to God.' " Chapter 2, Verse 136
bulletAbout the virgin Mary: "Relate in the Book (the story of) Mary, when she withdrew from her family to a place in the East. She placed a screen (to screen herself) from them: then We sent to her Our angel and he appeared before her as a man in all respects. She said: 'I seek refuge from thee to (God) Most Gracious: (come not near) if thou dost fear God.' He said: 'Nay I am only a messenger from thy Lord (to announce) to thee the gift of a holy son.' 1 She said: 'How shall I have a son seeing that no man has touched me and I am not unchaste?' He said: 'So (it will be): thy Lord saith "That is easy for Me: and (We wish) to appoint him as a Sign unto men and a Mercy from Us:" it is a matter (so) decreed.' " Chapter 19, verses 16-21.
bulletHonor one's parents: "Thy Lord hath decreed that ye worship none save Him, and show kindness to your parents. If one or both of them attain old age with thee, say not 'Fie' unto them or repulse them, but speak unto them a gracious word." Chapter 17, Verses 23-24

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

four imam of islam

I TOTALLY AGREE with ALL these "HADITHER SCHOLARS" when they say the following things
VERY FUNNY WORTH A READ
There were grave disputes between Imams Shafi’i, Abu Hanifa, Malik,
Hanbal and Sufiyan Sauri. Whoever uttered much nonsense was called a
Faqih (enlightened jurist). (Shah Waliullah, Hujjatullah Al Baligha pg 254)

The so-called Imams were all children of bondwomen. They destroyed
Islam just as the children of bondwomen had destroyed the Israelites.
(Safyan Sauri, Khateeb 13:394)

Out of the scores of mutual indictments of the ‘Imams’ , the following few
are worthy of a glance in Tareekh Khateeb Baghdadi, Vol 13 pp 390 to 396,
pg 498 on, and Vol 14 pg 257 on.
The mischief of Imam Abu Hanifa for the Ummah is no less than that of
Dajjal. According to Imam Abdur Rahman Mehdi, his Fitna is greater then
that of Dajjal, the anti-Christ.
Safyan Thauri and Imam Auzaa’i said, "No one as reprehensible as Abu

31
Hanifa has been born in Islam."
Abu Hanifa called Imam Ja’far Sadiq and Imam Malik as the worst of
creations.
Imam Shafi’i called Abu Hanifa the worst of creation.
Imam Abu Yousuf declared Imam Abdullah bin Mubarak a great sinner.
Abdullah replied, “Abu Yousuf is a greater sinner and a greater liar.”
Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal said, "I agree with what you are telling me, but if
Abu Hanifa supported it, then I reject it as nonsense."
Abu Hanifa and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal were "Munk
ireen" (deniers) of
Hadith.

A person told a Hadith on behalf of Imam Malik to Abu Hanifa that wudhu
(ablution) is half of faith. Imam Abu Hanifa responded, “You should
perform two ablutions so that your faith can become whole. (Khateeb
Baghdadi 13:387). This one makes sense.

Abu Hanifa should have been flogged since he accepted only 17 Ahadith.
(Khateeb 13:387)

Note: The complete name of the oft-quoted book below, Tahqiq-il-Mazahib,
is Gharaib fil Tahqiq-il-Mazahib Wa Tafhimul Masaail.
Abu Hanifa declared that Imam Malik was a man without any sense.
(Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)
Imam Ja’afar Sadiq was an ugly blot on Islam according to Ahmad bin
Hanbal. (Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)
Imam Naafe’ said, “Imam Shafi’i committed the most grievous crime,
calling Hadith as another form of revelation. He equated Hadith with Wahi.
(Tahqiq-il-Mazahib). This one is quite right.
Imam Shafi’i and Imam Malik were sodomites and catamites.” A Mullah at
large from Deoband (“Maulana” Yousuf Islahi), these days begins his
address by declaring Imam Shafi’i as his hero.
Imam Shafi’I, being a great forger, is totally unreliable. (Imam Yahya Bin
Moin in Jama’ Bayanul ‘Ilm)
Abu Hanifa had no trace of the knowledge of Deen. (Imam Ahmad Bin
32
Hanbal, Khateeb Baghdadi 13:396)
Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal was apparently a vanguard of Islam, but in truth,
he was a dangerous hypocrite. Mujahid-al-Munafiq Imam Ahmad bin
Hanbal, by Abdul Muhsin bin Mullah Ali Al-Qari, pg 67-135)
Abu Hanifa is no less than Iblees and Dajjal. (Imam Malik, Khateeb
Baghdadi 13:396)
The worst of all people in Islam is Abu Hanifa. He is Dajjal. (Abdur Rahman
Bin Mahdi, Imam Ozaa’i, Khateeb Baghdadi 13:498)
Imam Yahya bin Moin said that Iman Hanbal was a hidden Sabai (a bitter,
hateful Shi’a). (Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)
The Sacred Tank of water, Intercession, Angels questioning in the grave,
Doom of the grave, Returning of souls in the grave, are truths beyond
doubt. But Imam Bukhari said, “If Hanbal says that, it is all nonsense.”
(Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)
Abu Hanifa says, “Be the curse of Allah on those who call themselves
Imams… Imam Malik, Shafi’i and Ja’far Sadiq were deceitful liars and
sodomites. (Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)
Abu Hanifa said that the ‘Imams’ of Islam are worse than the crawling
creatures. (Durre-Mukhtar)
Imam Ja’far Sadiq himself was a master forger, but he called all Imams of
Figh and the hadith narrators as the worst creatures under the heavens.
(Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)
Imam Abu Yusuf said that other Imams were insects compared to Imam
Abu Hanifa. (Fatawa Alamgiri)
Jalaluddin Rumi narrated in his Mathnavi, “These four (Abu Hanifa, Malik,
Hanbal, and Shafi’i) have carved four religions out of one Islam. They have
created irreconcilable divisions in the Deen of Nabi (S).”

Saturday, 27 August 2011

concept of abrogation of verses of quran is only a lie

starting with the name of ALLAH-the most merciful

look at verse 2:106 of glorious quran

Yusuf Ali:
None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Knowest thou not that God Hath power over all things?
T. J. Irving:
We do not cancel any verse nor let it be forgotten instead We bring something better than it or else something similar. Do you not know that God is Capable of everything?

my friends just look at phrase we do not cancel any verse nor let it be forgotten.instead we bring something better than it or else similar to it.

when allah is saying we do not cancel any verse then how our scholors say verses of glorious quran got abrogated?.my brother there is huge diffrence between "cancellation " and word "replacement".In this verse god is talking about replacing verse with something better or similar..nowhere it is talking about verses being forgetten or cancelled.
The question which is coming in your mind "then why our scholor say many of verses got cancelled".Because or scholors never open quran .They only read corrupted books of hadith which contain nothing but lies.
now read these hadith and judge which is right quran or hadith/scholors.

Narrated Qatada: Anas told us that they (i.e. Muslims) used to recite a Qur'anic Verse concerning those martyrs which was: "O Allah! Let our people be informed on our behalf that we have met our Lord Who has got pleased with us and made us pleased." Then the Verse was cancelled.(Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 299)
And:

Narrated Anas bin Malik: (The tribes of) Ril, Dhakwan, 'Usaiya and Bani Lihyan asked Allah's Apostle to provide them with some men to support them against their enemy. He therefore provided them with seventy men from the Ansar whom we used to call Al-Qurra' in their lifetime. They used to collect wood by daytime and pray at night. When they were at the well of Ma'una, the infidels killed them by betraying them. When this news reached the Prophet, he said Al-Qunut for one month In the morning prayer, invoking evil upon some of the 'Arab tribes, upon Ril, Dhakwan, 'Usaiya and Bani Libyan. We used to read a verse of the Qur'an revealed in their connection, but later the verse was cancelled. It was: "convey to our people on our behalf the information that we have met our Lord, and He is pleased with us, and has made us pleased." (Anas bin Malik added:) Allah's Prophet said Qunut for one month in the morning prayer, invoking evil upon some of the 'Arab tribes (namely), Ril, Dhakwan, Usaiya, and Bani Libyan. (Anas added:) Those seventy Ansari men were killed at the well of Mauna. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 416)
Finally:
Narrated By Anas bin Malik: The Prophet invoked evil upon those (people) who killed his companions at Bir Mauna for 30 days (in the morning prayer). He invoked evil upon (tribes of) Ril, Lihyan and Usaiya who disobeyed Allah and His Apostle. Allah revealed a Qur'anic Verse to His Prophet regarding those who had been killed, i.e. the Muslims killed at Bir Ma'una, and we recited the Verse till later it was cancelled. (The Verse was:) “Inform our people that we have met our Lord, and He is pleased with us, and we are pleased with Him.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 5 Book 59, Number 421)
And according to this next narrative there are two missing surahs of the Qur’an:
Abu Harb b. Abu al-Aswad reported on the authority of his father that Abu Musa al-Ash'ari sent for the reciters of Basra. They came to him and they were three hundred in number. They recited the Qur'an and he said: You are the best among the inhabitants ofBasra, for you are the reciters among them. So continue to recite it. (But bear in mind) that your reciting for a long time may not harden your hearts as were hardened the hearts of those before you. We used to recite a surah which resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bara'at. I have, however, forgotten it with the exception of this which I remember out of it: "If there were two valleys full of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley, and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust." And we used to recite a surah which resembled one of the surahs of Musabbihat, and I have forgotten it, but remember (this much) out of it: "O people who believe, why do you say that which you do not practise?" (lxi. 2) and "that is recorded in your necks as a witness (against you) and you would be asked about it on the Day of Resurrection" (xvii. 13). (Sahih Muslim, Book 005, Number 2286)(1)
One of the ways Muslims have tried to work around the rather clear and explicit witness of the hadiths that there are missing verses and surahs is to argue that all of these additional passages and chapters were abrogated.
When We substitute one revelation for another, - and God knows best what He reveals (in stages), - they say, "Thou art but a forger": but most of them understand not. S. 16:101

note-in above verse word "substitute " is use not word "cancelled"
According to Islamic scholarship there are three types of abrogation, something never once stated or even alluded to in the Qur’an:
1) Abrogation of recitation.
2) Abrogation of ruling.
3) Abrogation of both ruling and recitation.
In light of this the Muslim propagandists would contend that the passages which we referred to fall under the first and third categories, which explains why they are not part of the Qur’an any longer.
Unfortunately for these dawagandists this explanation doesn’t solve the dilemma but actually raises additional problems for them to address.
First, Muslims are undecided as to how many verses have actually been abrogated or replaced:
The Abrogated Verses
There are, according to Ibn Salama, [Op cit., see pp.6-8 for the names of these suras.] a well-known author on the subject:
43 suras with neither nasikh or mansukh.
6 suras with nasikh but no mansukh.
40 suras with mansukh but no nasikh.
25 suras with both nasikh and mansukh.
According to Suyuti's Itqan there are 21 instances in the Qur'an, where a revelation has been abrogated by another.
He also indicates that there is a difference of opinion about some of these: e.g. 4: 8, 24: 58, etc. [Itqan, II, pp.20-3; Kamal, op.cit., pp.101-9 also gives Suyuti's complete list.]
Some scholars have attempted to reduce the number of abrogations in the Qur'an even further, by explaining the relationships between the verses in some special ways, e.g. by pointing out that no legal abrogation is involved, or that for certain reasons the naskh is not genuine
Shah Waliullah (d. 1759) the great Muslim scholar from India only retained the following 5 out of Suyuti's 21 cases as genuine:

Mansukh2:180
Nasikh 4:11, 12
Mansukh2:240
Nasikh 2:234.
Mansukh 8:65
Nasikh 8:62.
Mansukh30:50
Nasikh 33:52.
Mansukh 58:12
Nasikh 58:13.

Example:
A case listed by Suyuti, which has no direct legal implication is the following:
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: When the verse: 'If there are 20 amongst you, patient and persevering, they will overcome two hundred', was revealed, it became hard on the Muslims, when it became compulsory that one Muslim ought not to flee before 10 (non-Muslims) so Allah lightened the order by revealing: 'but now Allah has lightened your (task) for He knows that there is weakness in you. But (even so) if there are 100 amongst you who are patient and persevering, they will overcome 200 (non-Muslims)' (8:66).
So when Allah reduced the number of enemies that Muslims should withstand, their patience and perseverance against the enemy decreased as much as their task was lightened for them.[Bukhari, VI, No.176.]
Still others hold that there are no genuine (sahih) reports available on this issue, going back to the Prophet, while those going back to the Companions contradict each other. [Ali, M.M.: The Religion of Islam, Lahore, 1936, p.32. It may be pointed out that Ali's treatment of the subject is not very thorough. Of the three examples he cites in support of his opinion ('in most cases, where a report is traceable to one Companion who held a certain verse to have been abrogated, there is another report traceable to another Companion, through the fact that the verse was not abrogated' - p. 33) two are definitely not in his favour, while the third can be easily explained. His first case concerns Sura 2:180 (inheritance). It has certainly been superseded by other verses, e.g. 4:7-9 and that is probably all that is meant, when saying it is mansukh. Ali's second case, '2:184, is considered by Ibn 'Umar as having been abrogated while Ibn 'Abbas says it was not'. See below, where I have quoted this very hadith from Ibn 'Abbas (Bukhari, VI, No.32)where Ibn 'Abbas himself explains why he does not hold it as abrogated. The third case is, like the first one, definitely not in support of Ali: '2: 240 was abrogated according to Ibn Zubair, while Mujahid says it was not'. This is wrong, see Sahih Bukhari, VI, Nos. 53 and 54, where both Ibn Zubair and Mujahid hold the verse to be abrogated. Furthermore both Ibn Zubair and Mujahid are tabi'un, and not Companions (sahaba).]
Therefore to them the issue of nasikh wa al mansukh is perhaps not of great importance. However, it is clear from the Qur'an itself, (e.g. in the case of inheritance, 2:180; 4:7-9, etc.) that abrogation occurred occasionally. Hence it is wrong to completely ignore the subject. (Ahmad Von Denffer, Ulum al Qur’an)
This next list is adapted from Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi's, An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur'aan, published by al-Hidaayah Publishing and Distribution, Birmingham UK, Second Print 2003, Chapter 13. Abrogation in the Qur’aan: An-Naskh WaAl-Mansookh, VIII. The Number of of Naasikh/Mansookh Verses in the Qur'aan, p. 251.
Aboo Bakr ibn 'al-Arabee (d. 543 A.H.) - Accepted only 105 out of 297 possible candidates as naskh.
Mustafa Zayd - Accepted only 6 out of 283 cases.
Ibn al-Jawzee (d. 597 A.H.) - Accepted only 22 out of 247 cases.
Ibn Hazm (d. 456 A.H.) - Examined and accepted 214 possible cases as naskh.
Makkee ibn Abee Taalib (d. 437 A.H.) - Examined and rejected 200 possible cases of naskh.
Aboo Ja'far an-Nahas (d. 338 A.H.) - Accepted only 20 out of 134 cases.
Az-Zarqani - Accepted only 12 out of 22 cases.
As-Suyooti (d. 911 A.H.) - Accepted only 20 out 21 cases.
Ash-Shanqeeti - Examined and accepted 7 possible cases asnaskh.
Walee Allaah ad-Dehlawi (d. 1176 A.H.) - Examined and accepted 5 possible cases as naskh.
If the scholors were/are unsure concerning the exact number of abrogating/abrogated verses how, then, can anyone be absolutely certain that all of these missing verses are actually part of that which has been abrogated?
In light of this, can the scholors be so kind as to point out all the verses which replaced these missing citations?Can they produce the exact list of abrogating passages for every verse or surah that has been expunged from the Qur’an?
It is related from Ibn 'Abbas that 'Umar said, “Ubayy was the one of us with the best recitation, yet we leave some of the words of Ubayy. Ubayy said, ‘I took it from the mouth of the Messenger of Allah and WILL NOT LEAVE IT for anything.’ Allah Almighty says, 'Whenever We abrogate an ayat or cause it to be forgotten, We bring one better than it or equal to it.' (2:106)” (Aisha Bewley, Sahih Collection of al-Bukhari, Chapter 69. Book of the Virtues of the Qur'an, VIII: The reciters among the Companions of the Prophet: *; *)
See also Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan's version of Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 61, Number 527.
Ubayy ibn Kab wasn’t the only one since Uthman also refused to expunge the abrogated references from his codex:
XLVII: "Those of you who die leaving wives behind" (2:240)
4262. It is related that Ibn az-Zubayr said, "I said to 'Uthman, '"Those of you who die leaving wives behind" (2:234) in al-Baqara and 'Those of you who die leaving wives behind' (2:240) were abrogated by the other ayat and so why do you write it down?' He said, 'Leave it, O nephew, I will not change ANY OF IT from its place.'" (Bewley, Sahih al-Bukhari, Chapter 68. Book of Tafsir: *; *)
See also Khan’s version of Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60,Number 60.
This leads us to our fourth point. scholors following hadith themselves acknowledge that the Qur’an still contains some of the abrogated texts. Why, then, were all of these missing verses and surahs left out when other abrogated passages were kept in?
Fifth, the doctrine of abrogation contradicts the express testimony of the Qur’an that none can change Allah’s words.
And recite what has been revealed to you (O Muhammad) of the Book (the Qur'an) of your Lord (i.e. recite it, understand and follow its teachings and act on its orders and preach it to men).None can change His Words, and none will you find as a refuge other than Him. S. 18:27
According to the late Muslim scholar and Qur’anic translator Muhammad Asad this is one of the verses used by certain Muslims to refute the notion that the Qur’an abrogates itself:

“… According to Razi, it is on this passage, among others, that the great Qur’an-commentator Abu Muslim al-Isfahani based his rejection of the so-called ‘doctrine of abrogation’ discussed in my note 87 on 2:106.” (Asad, Message of the Qur’an[ Dar Al-Andalus Limited 3 Library Ramp, Gibraltar rpt. 1993], p. 443, fn. 35; source)
Related to the preceding is the sixth problem with this concept.Abrogation is nothing more than an expedient attempt of explaining away the major contradictions within the Qur’an. In fact, Asad himself believed that Muslims may have developed this doctrine due to their inability to satisfactorily harmonize the major discrepancies within their religious text. He writes in his footnote 87 to Q. 2:106 that:

“… The principle laid down in this passage - relating to the supersession of the Biblical dispensation by that of the Qur’an -has given rise to an erroneous interpretation by many Muslim theologians. The word ayah ('message') occurring in this context is also used to denote a ‘verse’ of the Qur’an (because every one of these verses contains a message). Taking this restricted meaning of the term ayah, some scholars conclude from the above passage that certain verses of the Qur’an have been ‘abrogated’ by God’s command before the revelation of the Qur’an was completed. Apart from the fancifulness of this assertion - WHICH CALLS TO MIND THE IMAGE OF A HUMAN AUTHOR CORRECTING, ON SECOND THOUGHT, THE PROOFS OF HIS MANUSCRIPT, deleting one passage and replacing it with another - there does not exist a single reliable Tradition to the effect that the Prophet ever declared a verse of the Qur’an to have been ‘abrogated’. At the root of the so-called ‘doctrine of abrogation’ MAY LIE THE INABILITY OF SOME EARLY COMMENTATORS TO RECONCILE ONE QUR'ANIC PASSAGE WITH ANOTHER; a difficulty which was overcome by declaring that one of the verses in question had been ‘abrogated’. This arbitrary procedure explains also why there is no unanimity whatsoever among the upholders of the ‘doctrine of abrogation’ as to which, and how many, Qur’an-verses have been affected by it; and furthermore, as to whether this alleged abrogation implies a total elimination of the verse from the context of the Qur’an, or only a cancellation of the specific ordinance or statement contained in it. In short, the ‘doctrine of abrogation’ has no basis in historical fact, and must be rejected…” (Asad, Message of the Qur’an[Dar Al-Andalus Limited 3 Library Ramp, Gibraltar rpt. 1993], pp. 22-23, n. 87; source)
Asad correctly points out that abrogation is an indication of human imperfections and weakness. Yet Asad wasn’t the only one who felt this way since the lateMaulana Muhammad Ali of the Ahmadiyya sect also rejected abrogation precisely because it violates the claim of the Qur’an that it is free from errors and discrepancies. Like Asad, Ali acknowledged that Muslims developed this concept because they were confronted with references that conflicted with one another, which they could not satisfactorily explain:
The principle on which the theory of abrogation is based is unacceptable, being contrary to the clear teachings of the Qur'an. A verse is considered to be abrogated when the two cannot be reconciled with each other; in other words, when they appear to contradict each other. But the Qur'an destroys this foundation when it declares that no part of it is at variance with another: "Will they not then meditate on the Qur'an? And if it were from any other than Allah, they would have found in it many a discrepancy" (4:82).



Amazingly, even a Sunni scholar who accepts the doctrine of abrogation candidly admits that one of the reasons for classifying specific texts are classified as nasikh or mansukh is because they contradict one another and cannot be harmonized!shame on him because there is not a single contradiction in quran


Now it is upto you to decide who is lying quran or our scholors who follow only hadiths

Friday, 26 August 2011

quran is complete

starting with the name of allah-the most merciful


‎"And We have revealed the Book to you which has clear explanation of everything, and a guidance, mercy and good news for those who submit." (Qur'an 16:89)

IN THIS GLORIOUS VERSE ALLAH IS CLEARLY SAYING THAT QURAN CONTAINS DETAIL EXPLAINATION OF EVERYTHING AND QURAN IS OUR GUIDE


NOW LOOK AT THIS  VERSE


There is not an animal (that lives) on the earth, nor a being that flies on its wings, but (forms part of) communities like you. nothing have we omitted from the Book, and they (all) shall be gathered to their Lord in the end.(quran 6:38)

look at phrase NOTHING WE HAVE OMITTED FROM THE BOOK.when our lord is clearly saying this then why sunni and shia scholors say that "we need hadith to perform prayer"


And We have indeed coined for humanity every kind of similitude (mathal) in this Qur'an that they may reflect (39:27; see also 17:89, 18:54, 30:58).

when allah is clearly saying that quran contains every kind of similitude why sunni and shia needs hadith.quran gives reason for sunni and shia's need of hadith


And We have explained to man, in this Qur'an, every kind of similitude: yet the greater part of men refuse (to receive it) except with ingratitude!(quran 17:89)


look at phrase 
yet the greater part of men refuse (to receive it) except with ingratitude!this is the reason why our scholors need hadith.


now look at allah warning to human being for not following what have been revealed
.....Those who do not judge by what Allah has revealed are indeed the unbelievers.(quran 5:44)

 Let the followers of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein, and those who do not judge by what Allah has revealed are the transgressors(quran 5:47)

my dear brothers and sister open quran and read with a unbiased mind..you will realize the truth that hadith books are nothing but lies.


allah knows best.

Monday, 22 August 2011

Quran explains itself







Misconception

The messenger’s job was not just to deliver the Qur’an like a postman but his duty is also to explain and give commentary of the divine message. In many Quranic verses it is stated that he gives the knowledge of the Book. The knowledge and Tafsir (Exegesis) of the Book of Allah that the messenger has given is contained in the books of traditions. Thus Qur’an is the theory while the compilations of traditions are its Tafsir.

Clarification

While it is correct to state that the messengers duty was not restricted to merely reciting the Qur’an to his people, as is evident by the words: "...He will give them the knowledge of the Book ..." (2:129), it is also an incontestable fact that the books of traditions that are upheld by varous sects and attributed to the messenger, do not contain the explanation of each and every verse of the Qur’an. What exists in those compilations are some ascribed paradoxical reports limited to certain verses only. No book of tradition contains the complete commentary and explanation of the Qur’an from Surah Al-Fatiha, the first chapter to Surah An-Naas, the last chapter, that it could attribute to the messenger of Allah.
This being the case, the question arises that how did the messenger confer the knowledge of the Book of Allah to his audience? And where can we find those explanations? The Qur’an provides us the adequate answer to these questions of extreme importance.
Allah informs us that His Book has been kept independent of all sorts of traditions for its exegesis, by indicating that the Qur’an is its own commentary.
The Qur'an is not like an ordinary book, such that most other books discuss a specific topic at one place and have their subjects compiled and bifurcated within specific chapters.
Unlike this, the Book of Allah has its topics spread out throughout itself within various chapters. For example, if we were to ascertain as to what Allah's Book says about the topic of divorce we find verses dealing with the subject of divorce in Surah Al-Baqara which is the second Surah (chapter) of the Qur'an, Surah Al Nisa the fourth Chapter , then in Surah Al Ahzaab the thirty third chapter and further in Sura At Tal'aaq which is the sixty fifth chapter of the Qur'an.
By compiling all the verses about the topic of divorce as discussed in all the locations of the Qur'an we come to know what the Book of Allah has to say about this subject. And we observe that each verse clarifies and explains the other. It is by this manner that Allah Himself has dealt with different subjects in His Book, i.e. by repeating topics in various chapters throughout the Qur'an. The manner of exegesis is <Tasreef ul Ayaat> or recurrence and repetition of subjects within the Qur’anic verses, and it is by this method that the Book of Allah deals with various topics and provides its own explanation. We are reminded:
<unzur kaifa nusarriful a_ya_ti la'allahum yafqahu_n>

"See how We repeat the verses that they may understand." (6:65)

<Wa laqad sarrafna_ lin na_si fi ha_zal qur'a_ni min kulli masal(in), fa aba_ aksarun na_si illa_ kufu_ra>

"And certainly We have repeated for mankind in this Quran, every kind of similitude, but the majority of mankind do not consent to aught but denying." (17:89)

Allah Himself has circulated topics within His Book, and what is unclear at one passage is made distinct by another verse in another passage within the Qur’an itself. One verse will throw light on the other. Furthermore we are informed that the messenger of Allah also explained the Qur’an by the Qur’an itself:
<Wa kaza_lika nusarriful a_ya_ti wa liyaqu_lu_ darasta wa linubayyinahu_ liqaumiy ya'lamu_n>

"And thus do We repeat the verses and that they may say: You have read; and that We may make it clear to a people who know." (6:108)

It is evident from the above that the messenger’s lectures on the Qur’an were based on <tasreef_ul_ayat>, i.e. recurrence of Ayat, to clarify topics within the Qur’an. The messenger gave Dars ul Qur-an, by this manner, and the Qur’an was clarified by the Qur’an itself. This is further supported in Surah Al-Furqan, where a certain objection of the unbelievers is identified:
<Wa qa_lal lazina kafaru_ lau la_ nuz zila alaihil qur a_nu jumlataw wa_hidah kaza_lika linusab bita bihi fu a_daka wa rat talna_hu tartila_Wa la_ yatu_naka bimasalin il la_ jina_ka bil haq qi wa ahsana tafsira>

"The unbelievers say: "Why is not the Qur'an revealed to him all at once? Thus (is it revealed gradually) that We may strengthen thy heart thereby and We have rehearsed it to thee in slow well-arranged stages gradually. And no example do they bring to thee but We bring to thee the truth and the best explanation." (25:32-33)

The above verses inform us about a matter of grave importance. To the objection of unbelievers as to why is not the Qur’an revealed all at once, it is stated that the Qur’an is revealed in stages due to the following reasons:
  1. So that the messengers heart may be strenghtened. This is confirmed when it is stated: "Thus (is it revealed gradually) that We may strengthen thy heart thereby and We have rehearsed it to thee in slow well-arranged stages gradually." Hence the messenger was encouraged and enjoined to be stead fast by the revelation of Qur’anic verses.
  2. So that the arguments that the unbelievers may bring forth should be answered sufficiently by ‘Haqq’, i.e. the Qur’anic truth. As it is stated: "And no example do they bring to thee but We bring to thee the truth.."
  3. The third reason for the gradual descent of the Qur’an is to provide <Ahsan_ul_Tafsir>, i.e. the best explanation and exegesis of Allah’s Book.
<Wa la_ yatu_naka bimasalin il la_ jina_ka bil haq qi wa ahsana tafsira>

"And no example do they bring to thee but We bring to thee the truth and the best ‘Tafsir’ (exegesis)" (25:33)

Thus Allah revealed verses which provided Tafsir of other verses themselves. What remained ambigous in one verse, its clarification and exegesis was provided by Allah Himself by the gradual descent of other verses of the Qur’an. Hence Allah provided the Tafsir of the Qur’an by the Qur’an itself, and did not make His Book dependent on any compilations of traditions for its exegesis. It is by this manner that Allah gave the Tafsir of His Book to the messenger and the messenger inturn conveyed to his audience. The messenger did not give any separate book of Tafsir to the Ummah as the Tafsir of the Qur’an which he imparted on the Ummah was contained inside the pages of the Qur’an itself.
While it is identified that the Qur’an explains its self by repetition of verses, we are also instructed to ponder and reflect on Allah’s Book, for the message of the Qur’an will be evident to those who will strive to comprehend its meaning and conduct research on it. It is mentioned that those who will use their faculties of understanding and engage in an inquiry into the meaning of the divine message, for them the Qur’anic verses will be rendered plain:

"Thus do We make the verses distinct for a people who reflect." (10:24)


"Indeed We have made the verses distinct for a people who will utilize their understanding." (6:98)

Along with stating the above, we are also advocated to ponder and reflect on the Book:

"A Book We have revealed to you abounding in good that they may ponder over its verses, and that those endowed with understanding may be mindful." (38:29)

Thus the injunction to reflect and ponder over the Book has been given for all generations, so that in the light of divine guidance they seek the solutions to the problems of their times. The meaning of the Qur’an will be made clear by the repetition of verses and likewise people are asked to use their abilities of reason and intellect to understand the Qur’an. The following verses shed further light in stating that the meaning of Allah’s Book will be evident by <Tasreef ul Ayat> and it is in this manner that Qur’an should be understood:

" See how We repeat the verses that they may understand." (6:65)


"See how We repeat the verses, yet they turn away (from the truth rendered by recurrence of Ayat)." (6:46)

It is Allah, who is the ‘Mufasir’ i.e commentator of the Qur’an, and the Tafsir of one verse was provided by the revelation of other verses which would throw light on the subject under discussion. Thus it is said:

"Ar-Rahmaan (The Beneficent God). It is He who teaches the Qur’an." (55:1-2)

Not only was the revelation, compilation and protection of the Book taken up by Allah himself, but also its explanation. As we are informed:

"Do not move your tongue with this (Qur'an) to make haste with it. Surely on Us (devolves) the collecting of it and the reciting of it. Therefore when We have recited it, follow its recitation. Again on Us (devolves) the explaining of it." (75:16-19)

Hence it is Allah who provides the Tafsir of His Book by <Tasreef ul Ayat>, that is, by repetition of verses. We will now observe the manner of Tafsir of Qur’anic subjects that is given by Allah in His Book itself and which was consequently taught by the messenger to his audience.

Example of Tafsir provided by Allah in the Qur'an itself, and given by Nabi (S.A.W) to the Ummah

Here we demonstrate how the Qur’an has clarified its own concepts and thus becomes its own best Tafsir. In Surah Al-Baqara, the very beginning of the Qur’an, it is stated that Allah’s Book is guidance for ‘Mutaqeen’ (those who guard from injurious activity):

"That is The Book, there is no perplexity in it, guidance for the ‘Mutaqeen’." (2:2)

In the above verse, a question can be raised as to, who are the 'Mutaqeen'? What are their qualities? The answer to these questions and many others like them are given in the Qur'an itself, in the advancing verses of Sura Al Baqara as well as other verses.Like:

"And hasten to the protection given from your Sustainer against the consequences of faults; and a Garden, the extensiveness of which is (as) the heavens and the earth, it is prepared for the ‘Mutaqeen’. (They are) Those who spend in ease as well as in straitness, and those who restrain (their) anger and pardon men; and Allah loves the doers of good (to others).And those who when they commit an indecency or do injustice to their souls remember (the law of) Allah and seek protection from the consequences of their faults-- and who can give protection from the consequences of faults but Allah, and (who) do not knowingly persist in what they have done." (3:133-135)

Thus the above verses shed light on the attributes of ‘Mutaqeen’, similiarly further Tafsir of above is given in other passages of the Qur’an:

"Surely the 'Mutaqeen' will be in the midst of Garden and springs.Taking joy in the things which their Sustainer gives them,because before that they lived a good life.(further details given about them) They were in the habit of sleeping but little by night.And in the hours of early dawn they were found seeking protection from the consequences of faults. And in their wealth was the right of him who asked and also of those who were prevented (from asking)." (51:15-19)

The ‘Mutaqeen’ always keep the divine guidance before themselves while dealing in any situation pertaining to human affairs, thus they guard themselves from the injurious effects of those actions which are not consistent with the divine laws:

"Surely those who guard (al lazina attaqau), when a visitation from the Shaitan afflicts them, they remind themselves (of the divine laws), then lo! they see (the right way)." (7:201)

Apart from implementing the social laws given for human guidance in Allah’s Book, the ‘Mutaqeen’ also concentrate on harnessing the laws of nature, and guard themselves from the ill effects of being unaware of their utilization. They are reminded about this aspect in the following Surah:

"He it is Who made the sun a shining brightness and the moon a light, and ordained for it mansions that you might know the computation of years and the reckoning. Allah did not create it but with truth; He makes the signs manifest for a people who have knowledge. Most surely in the variation of the night and the day, and what Allah has created in the heavens and the earth, there are signs for a people who guard <qaum in yataqoon>." (10:5-6)

From above we observe how the Qur’an itself gives the explanation of its Ayat and how its passages shed light on other passages. Further example of the Tafsir of Qur’an by the Qur’an itself is demonstrated by considering the following verse:

"O you who believe! Be not like those who annoyed Moses, but Allah cleared him of what they said, and he was worthy of regard with Allah." (33:69)

In the above verse, some people are mentioned who used to annoy Moses, the messenger of Allah in a certain way. Now who are these people and in what manner did they harass a messenger of God? The Qur’an itself provides the detailed description of this category of people and their means of harassment.

Tafseel (Details) of annoyance imparted to Moses by his people

Although his people should have been grateful to Moses for bringing them out of the bondage of Pharoah, but instead of expressing their gratitude they used to say:

"They said: ‘We have had (nothing but) trouble both before and after thou came to us."(7:129)

They were given heavenly sustenence in the form of <Man wa salwa>, but they rebelled even at that and said to Moses:

"O Moses! we cannot endure one kind of food (always).." (2:61)

While passing through a habitation they observed some people being dedicated to the service of idols, and seeing this they asked Moses, a messenger of God who had always taught them not to bow down before anyone except Allah, that:

".. O Moses! Make for us a god as they have (their) gods He said: Surely you are a people acting ignorantly." (7:138)

When Moses went for communion with Allah for a few days, they started worshiping the calf. (see 20:86). When they were told to maintain a certain type of behaviour while entering a city, they deliberately acted insolently (see 2:58-59). When Moses directed them to have belief in Allah, they told him:

"O Moses! We will not believe in you until we see Allah manifestly.." (2:55)

When God instructed them through the agency of Moses to slaughter a calf in order to purify them from the false sanctity they had developed due to the worship of idols, they gave numerous excuses, the details of which are given in (2:67-71). Moses asked them to enter the Holy land which was written for them, but instead they again started making excuses and replied:

"..go therefore you and your Sustainer, then fight you both surely we will here sit down." (5:24)

This was the attitude and insolent behaviour that the people of Moses demonstrated in front of their messenger, and it was because such annoying behaviour that Moses was compelled to say:

"And when Moses said to his people: O my people! why do you annoy me? And you know indeed that I am Allah's messenger to you.."(61:5) And he thus implored God:
"He said: My Sustainer! Surely I have no control (upon any) but my own self and my brother; therefore make a separation between us and the nation of transgressors."(5:25)

Hence it is by bringing forth the above mentioned narratives of the Children of Israel, the Believers in the Qur’anic message were instructed:

"..Be not like those who annoyed Moses.." (33:69)

The reader can see how clearly and without any vagueness the Qur’an has listed the annoyance that the people of Moses had imparted to their messenger, and the manner in which the meaning of verse 33:69 is clarified in the Qur’an itself. But against this the books of traditions attribute the following narration to the person of the messenger, to demonstrate his explanation of the divine Book. While considering the Tradition given below, it should be kept in mind that the messenger was to give the Tafsir of the Qur’an by repetition of verses, and explained the Qur’an by the Qur’an itself, as stated in 6:104.
It is stated in Sahih Al-Bukhari:

"It has been narrated to me by Ishaq bin Ibraheem, as Ruh bin Ubadah told us, from Auf who was informed by Al Hasan, Muhammad and Khilas, that he narrated from Abu Hurraira who said that, Allah's Apostle said, "(The Prophet) Moses was a shy person and used to cover his body completely because of his extensive shyness. One of the children of Israel hurt him by saying, 'He covers his body in this way only because of some defect in his skin, either leprosy or scrotal hernia, or he has some other defect.' Allah wished to clear Moses of what they said about him, so one day while Moses was in seclusion, he took off his clothes and put them on a stone and started taking a bath. When he had finished the bath, he moved towards his clothes so as to take them, but the stone took his clothes and fled; Moses picked up his stick and ran after the stone saying, 'O stone! Give me my garment!' Till he reached a group of Bani Israel who saw him naked then, and found him the best of what Allah had created, and Allah cleared him of what they had accused him of. The stone stopped there and Moses took and put his garment on and started hitting the stone with his stick. By Allah, the stone still has some traces of the hitting, three, four or five marks. This was what Allah refers to in His Saying: "O you who believe! Be you not like those Who annoyed Moses, But Allah proved his innocence of that which they alleged, And he was honorable In Allah's Sight."33/69- (Sahih Bukhari Volume 4 Hadith 616)

The readers are urged to carefully examine the above narration in which a mighty messenger of God is humilated in front of his people, and the Qur’anic repetitions pertaining to the subject. The guile of the people who forged this tradition should also be observed, as to how they absolved themselves from this fictitious tale, by cleverly attributing it to the person of the messenger of Allah (p), thus taking advantage of the immense love and respect that the Muslims have for him in their hearts in order to insert their forgeries within the house of Islam. While the Qur’an has informed us that the messenger imparted knowledge of Allah’s Book by giving its explanation as occured within the passages of the Book itself, can we consider the story given in the above tradition to earnestly come from the messenger?
To any person who sincerely seeks to ascertain the meaning of the Qur’an it will be apparent that passages of the Qur’an explain and comment each other, and are not dependent on any outisde source for their exegesis. Although many Modern day translators of the Qur’an are also marred by traditional preconceptions in their work, but they have also realized this fact, and have acknowledged that the Qur’an is its own ‘Tafsir’.
Renowed Islamic Scholar, Allama Abdullah Yusuf Ali, has the following to say as concluding remarks in the preface to Qur’anic commentaries, given in his world famous translation and commentary of the Qur’an:

"It has been said that the Qur’an is its own best commentary . As we proceed with the study of the Book, we find how true this is. A careful comparison and collation of passages from the Qur’an removes many difficulties. Use a good concordance, such as the one I have named among the Works of reference, and you will find that one passage throws light on another."
The Holy Qur’an- Translation and commentary by A. Yusuf Ali, pp xi
Another renown Translator of the Qur’an, Muhammad Asad also acknowledges that the Qur’an provides its own Tafsir, when he states the following in the foreword of His Translation:

"The Qur’an must not be viewed as a compilation of individual injunctions and exhortations but as one integral whole: that is, as an exposition of an ethical doctrine in which every verse and sentence has an intimate bearing on other verses and sentences, all of them clarifying and amplifying one another. Consequently, its real meaning can be grasped only if we correlate every one of its statements with what has been stated elsewhere in its passages, and try to explain its ideas by means of frequent cross references, always subordinating the particular to the general and the incidental to the intrinsic. Whenever this rule is faithfully followed, we realize that the Qur’an is - in the words of Muhammed Abduh- "its own best commentary". The Message of THE QUR-AN by Muhammad Asad, pp vii
A person should approach the Book for the purpose of sincerely seeking divine guidance, and should keep his mind receptive and free from all pre conceived notions. If this is done, the meaning of the Qur’an will be clearly apparent to him and he will discover that the Qur’an is a simple, clear and self explanatory Book, kept independent from all sorts of traditions for its exegesis. 

obeying messenger


Salam and Peace!
Please consider this very important point:
Allah ordered us to obey Allah and obey the Messenger.
-----"O you who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger." (Al-Nisaa-59)
Then further Allah declares:
-----"He who obeys the Messenger, has indeed obeyed Allah." (Al-Nisa-80)
It means there is no Inconsistency in "Obeying Allah" and "Obeying the Messenger".
It means what the Messenger is saying, is exactly what Allah is saying.
And, indeed, it is so.
Read the Verse:
-----"And he (the Messenger) does not speak of his own desire. It is not but a Revelation that is revealed." (Al-Najum-3,4)
Allah declared that His Messenger does not speak from his own desire.-----He does not issue any commandment from his own judgement.-----He only gives people The Revelation.
Why???---Because It is only Allah Who issues Hukm:
-----"Surely the Hukm (Law and Judgment) is for none, but Allah." (Yousuf-40)
Allah do not make anyone His associate in His Hukm:
-----"He does not make anyone His associate in His Hukm (Law and Judgment)" (Al-Kahaf-26)
Means Allah does not make even His Messengers His associate in His Hukm.
Was the Messenger authorised by Allah to issue any teachings besides The Quran?
Allah asserts to all believers that the Messenger was commanded not to teach any other teachings, otherwise he would incur severe punishment from Allah.
-----"It is a Revelation from the Lord of the universe. Had he (Muhammad) uttered any other teachings, We would have grabbed him by the right, and We would have severed his Wateen (Major artery of the heart), none of you could have helped him." (Al-Haqqa-43-47)
And so, the Messenger is declaring in Al-Quran, that he can not make any change in Al-Quran, or he can not give any new teachings other than Al-Quran.
-----"And when Our Verses are recited to them as clear Evidence, those who hope not for their meeting with Us, say: “Bring a quran other than this (Quran), or make changes in this (Quran).” Say (O Messenger): “It is not for me to change it on my own accord. I follow not but that which is revealed unto me. Indeed, I fear, if I were to disobey my Lord, the punishment of a Great Day.” (Younus:15)
So, it is clear like daylight, that the Messenger only speaks what was revealed to him.
Read this Verse:
-----"O Prophet, why do you make unlawful that which Allah has made lawful for you. Seeking to please your wives. And Allah is All Forgiving, All Merciful." (Al-Tahreem-1)
It clearly means that anything that Allah made "Lawful",-----the Messenger was not authorized to make it "un--Lawful".
And anything that Allah did not make compulsory in His Exalted Quran, the Messenger was not authorized to make it Deen (beard, etc.).
So, what Allah allows, the Messenger allows.
And what Allah forbids, the Messenger forbids.
That is why, one who obeys the Messenger, obeys Allah.
-----"He who obeys the Messenger, has indeed obeyed Allah." (Al-Nisa-80)
So, the only reason that "Obeying the Messenger" is the same as "Obeying Allah", is that the Messenger conveys The Message only.
Please read the diagram below, horizontally, and then vertically.

Obeying Allah                          =    Obeying the Messenger
     |                                                            |
     |                                                            |
     \/                                                          \/
The Message that He sent       =   The Message that he brought.

            \                                                              /
             \                                                           /
              \                                                        /
                \                                                    /
                  \                                                /
                   \                                             /
                    \                                          /
                      \                                      /
                                The Message


So, it is very much clear that the Messenger taught The Message only. That is why "Obeying Allah"and "Obeying the Messenger" are one thing and consistent.
And this consistency is Islam.
Remember, there is no inconsistency in Isalm. (Sects differ with each other. Open Shirk).
But the man-made books of ahadith show that the Messenger spoke other than Al-Quran.
These books show that Allah made His Messenger His associate in His Hukm---and the Messenger issued new commandments, side by side Allah, from his own understanding. (e.g. Stoning the zani to death, killing the apostate, killing the blasphemer, beard, etc.)-----
----whereas, these commandments are not found in Al-Quran.
(It clearly means,----very very clearly means that the Messenger was not only a Messenger of The Message,----he was also an initiator of new commandments from his own understanding.-----New commandments, which are not to be found in Allah's Safe, Holy, Exalted and Supreme Quran.)
Then how can "Obeying Allah " and "Obeying the Messenger" can be one thing???
Then how can "Obeying Allah " and "Obeying the Messenger" can be Consistent???
Ironically:
According to Bukhari-followers, "Obeying Allah " and "Obeying the Messenger" are two different things.
And ironically, they claim from their own mouth that "Obeying Allah" is Al-Quran, and "Obeying the Messenger" is the ahadith.
And more ironically,---(if "Obeying the Messenger" is the ahadith)-----then if someone follows ahadith in Sahih Al-Bukhari, it means he has Obeyed the Messenger,---and if he has Obeyed the Messenger,---then he has Obeyed Allah.
Where has Al-Quran gone???
The ummah has got rid of Allah and His Quran, finally!
Imam Bukhari is enough for them!---(Take rufuge in Allah!)
-----"And when Allah, the One is mentioned, the hearts of those who do not believe in the Hereafter are filled with disgust. And when those (whom they worship) besides Him are mentioned, behold, they rejoice." (Al-Zamur-45)
People are not angry when Imam Bukhari is mentioned.-----They are happy!!!
-----"But, man will be a witness against himself. Even if he offers his excuses." (Al-Qiyamah-14,15)
They are witness against themselves of what they hold up to.
And very strange!-----They confess it with their own mouth.
===============================================================
Don't say people don't understand.-----People understand everything, at least, when Allah's Revealed Truth is put before them.
Yet, even after understanding Allah's Verses well, they find it difficult to accept The Truth, The Only Truth in the universe.---Why?
Just close your eyes, and peep into your heart. You will find the criminal there.
-----The "Ego".-----Kick him out!
Report to moderator Logged
The Corrupt, Sectarian and Criminal "Ulama Karam" are responsible for the Downfall and Humiliation of this Ummah at the hands of the kuffaar. These criminal Ulama Karam have made the Ummah their slaves, and have divided them into Haram and Mushrik SECTS!
These Criminal "Ulama Karam" knowingly stop people from Allah.
Indeed the biggest criminals are the people themselves. They delibrately run away from Allah and His Exalted Quran.